Legal Opinion

Lindheim v. Duys

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the defendant, and from order denying plaintiffs motion, for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action was to recover $1,163.25 damages for breach of warranty upon the sale of tobacco, that it was of “ perfect burn,” which is a trade term, signifying that the tobacco would burn perfectly white or grayish-white, a result considered material to a purchase.

The answer denied the alleged warranty, and set up a counterclaim for $642.84, part of the unpaid purchase price of the tobacco. t

The jury, by their verdict, found 'there was no warranty, and, as a necessary consequence, that the defendant was entitled to his counterclaim, about which there was no dispute.

*17The plaintiff assigns as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. . New Jersey Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Pease v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Langley v. . WadsworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Jones v. . OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  5. McGinley v. . United States Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rheinfeldt v. DahlmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  2. Horowitz v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  3. Lack v. WeberAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API