Barnes v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
The movant filed his motion under Rule 27.26 attacking his conviction for first degree robbery and his sentence to imprisonment for 19 years. The movant entered into a stipulation for the disposition of that motion. The motion court entered a judgment upon that stipulation. The movant appeals contending that the judgment does not conform to the stipulation and the motion court made insufficient findings of fact.
The following is a summary of the proceedings. A jury found the defendant guilty of robbery in the first degree and assessed his punishment at imprisonment *401for 15 years.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Carver v. WhippleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scharnhorst v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Scharnhorst v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989