Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Looney

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1954No. 4759PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Holding the remedy afforded petitioner under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 exclusive, the trial court dismissed this application for writ of habeas corpus and remanded the Appellant to the custody of the warden of the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. We agree.

The Appellant pleaded guilty to an indictment containing four counts charging the transportation in interstate commerce of four falsely made, forged and counterfeited checks in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314. After commitment, Appellant filed a motion to vacate under § 2255 alleging that he had not committed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. Kreuter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  3. Clough v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  5. Holloway v. LooneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carl R. Osborne v. C. H. Looney, Warden United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  2. Wright v. Looney, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  3. Wright v. Looney, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API