State v. Hamilton
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Judge.
Defendant, Ronald Hamilton, was convicted by a jury of robbery in the second degree, § 569.030, RSMo.1979. On appeal, defendant argues the trial court erred in not granting him a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. We affirm.
About 2:40 a.m., in February, 1985, the victim, Calvin Granbury (Granbury), was driving his car in St. Louis, in an area where prostitutes ply their trade; an area quaintly called “the stroll”. Defendant and co-defendant Hill flagged down Gran-bury and forced their way into his car. Holding his hand in his pocket, defendant told Granbury he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Herbert R. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Walter MetzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State v. MucieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. HarperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- State v. MooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. RoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Byrd v. ArmontroutDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988
- State v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.