Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1987No. 51283PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

Defendant, Ronald Hamilton, was convicted by a jury of robbery in the second degree, § 569.030, RSMo.1979. On appeal, defendant argues the trial court erred in not granting him a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. We affirm.

About 2:40 a.m., in February, 1985, the victim, Calvin Granbury (Granbury), was driving his car in St. Louis, in an area where prostitutes ply their trade; an area quaintly called “the stroll”. Defendant and co-defendant Hill flagged down Gran-bury and forced their way into his car. Holding his hand in his pocket, defendant told Granbury he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Herbert R. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Walter MetzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. State v. MucieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. State v. HarperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. State v. MooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. RoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Byrd v. ArmontroutDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988
  5. State v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API