Legal Opinion

Ferry v. Carlsmith

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1917No. 955PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Exceptions prom Circuit Court, Fourth Circuit. Hon. C. F. Parsons, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

COKE, J.

(Robertson, C.J., dissenting.)

This is an action based upon alleged false and defamatory words spoken maliciously of and concerning plaintiff herein in the course of defendant’s address, as an attorney, to a jury impaneled to try the case of John Mitsuhashi against Joseph Ferry, plaintiff herein, then pending in and before the fourth circuit court. The latter case was an *590action for damages for alleged malicious prosecution of said Mitsuhashi by Ferry. In that case Carlsmith, the defendant herein, was the attorney for Mitsuhashi.

The plaintiff’s second amended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Press Pub. Co. v. GilletteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  2. Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Matsuura v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Carvalho v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. McCarthy v. YempukuHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Carvalho v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API