Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1920No. 5486PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

—The conviction is for forgery. The instrument charged to have been forged is a duplicate deposit slip, it being averred that the First National Bank of Santo, Texas, received a deposit of $190 for the account of Minnie Williams, and issued to her a deposit slip dated the thirteenth day of December, 1918. The allgations show that the slip was issued by Paul Bryan, an officer of the bank, and that he endorsed on the receipt his initials “P. B.that the slip was altered by the appellant by changing it so that the date appeared December 7, and the amount of the deposit $110.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Batte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Camacho v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Stark v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Stark v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API