Legal Opinion
United States v. Booker Thomas Harrell, United Bonding Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1969No. 19486_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from the district court’s refusal to require a complete or partial remission of a bond forfeiture under Rule 46(f) (2) and (4), Fed.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A.
The facts show that on February 16, 1968, defendant Booker Thomas Harrell entered a plea of not guilty to a two count indictment charging illegal purchase and sale of narcotics under 26 U.S.C.A. § 4704(a). The indictment was brought in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. Bond was set at $5,000 and was executed by Harrell and by an attorney in fact on behalf of the United…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adrian Lawrence Dudley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Smaldone v. United States. Varone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Larson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. BradleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Harry Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Joseph J. Nell and Leonard Weinstein, SuretyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- State v. AscencioCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- United States v. James William Nash and the Summit Fidelity & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Joseph J. Nell and Leonard Weinstein, SuretyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975