Legal Opinion

Gasifier Mfg. Co. v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided October 9, 1939No. Nos. 138, 65PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

On motion for summary judgment, that motion should undoubtedly be denied, if there is any disputed issue of fact. In determining whether there is a disputed issue of fact, as I gather from the authorities, the petition, the interrogatories, the affidavits, admissions, are all to be considered.

It is clear at this stage of the proceeding that the plaintiff’s patent is one for an improvement in the art of applying heat to the mixture of air and gasoline at a point between the carburetor and intake valves of an internal combustion motor for the purpose of vaporizing all the gasoline in that…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc. v. Ulen (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Miller v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  3. Dorotha L. Champlin v. Oklamoha Furniture Manufacturing Company, a Corporation, and the Evans Company, D/B/A Big Red WarehouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  4. Brown v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
  5. Rubinstein v. Silex Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API