Orcutt v. McGinley
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
The suit was brought to cancel bonds issued by the Alfalfa Irrigation District and to enjoin the collection of
*763irrigation taxes levied on property therein. The district court sustained the bonds, but denied plaintiff relief as to the taxes. The judgment below was affirmed. Orcutt v. McGinley, 96 Neb. 619. This is a motion by plaintiff to modify the affirmance to the extent of enjoining the collection of the irrigation taxes levied during the years 1896 to 1908, inclusive. It is stipulated that the' taxes for the year 1896 are invalid. On the face of the record the assessments for the other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hutchinson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Harmon v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Orcutt v. McGinleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
- Schneider v. PlumNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hodder v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
- Weinberger v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1927