Legal Opinion
Pensmore Reinforcement Technologies, LLC, d/b/a Helix Steel v. McClay Industries PTY, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 7, 2022No. 4:20-cv-13073Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PENSMORE REINFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Case No. 2:20-cv-13073 HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III Plaintiff, v. MCCLAY INDUSTRIES PTY, LTD., and REUBEN RAMSAY, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS [17] In the present trade secrets case, Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. ECF 17. The parties fully briefed the motion, and a hearing is unnecessary. See E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(f)(2). For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. NicastroSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Darrell J. Bird v. Marshall Parsons, Stephen Vincent, George Decarlo, Dotster, Inc., and afternic.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Dennis T. Serras, Michael C. Gibbons, and Dieter J. Boehm v. First Tennessee Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.