Legal Opinion
In Re Haedo
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 7, 1997No. 19-35234PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY
STUART M. BERNSTEIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The United States of America (the “Government”) owes a refund to the debtor Jorge Haedo (“Jorge”) and his non-debtor spouse, Christina (“Christina”), for the 1994 tax year. The Government desires to set off the refund against Jorge’s (and Christina’s) tax liability accruing after the filing of this chapter 11 case. It moves for a declaration that the automatic stay does not prevent it from doing so, but if it does, the Court should grant it stay relief. Jorge opposes the motion.
At issue…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re Crysen/montenay Energy Co., Debtor. Crysen/montenay Energy Co. v. Esselen Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- In Re Prudential Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- In Re ContiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Regency Holdings (Cayman), Inc. v. Microcap Fund, Inc. (In Re Regency Holdings (Cayman), Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Winick & Rich, P.C. v. Strada Design Associates, Inc. (In Re Strada Design Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- BNY Financial Corp. v. Masterwear Corp. (In Re Masterwear Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In Re SteinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In re DuarteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.