Legal Opinion

Carl Michael Soto v. Sheriff Chad Chronister, in his individual and official capacity, et al.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided September 18, 2026No. 8:25-cv-00839Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Carl Michael Soto, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:25-cv-00839-JLB-SPF Sheriff Chad Chronister, in his individual and official capacity, et al., Defendants. / ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Deputy Alex Almaguer’s Motion for Sanctions against Plaintiff Carl Michael Soto.1 (Doc. 73). Mr. Soto responded in opposition. (Doc. 78). Upon careful consideration, the Motion is DENIED. LEGAL STANDARD Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, an attorney or unrepresented party who files a pleading in federal court “certifies that to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Ned Hughes v. Charles LottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Baker v. AldermanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Paul Stephens v. Nick Degiovanni, individuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Davis v. CarlCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API