Legal Opinion

Carter v. Scheidt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1964No. 528PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Following provisions with reference to the aggrieved party’s petition and the Commissioner’s answer, G.S. 20-279.2 (b), in pertinent part, provides:

“(b) ... At the hearing upon the petition the judge shall sit without the intervention of a jury and shall receive such evidence as shall be deemed by the judge to be relevant and proper. Except as otherwise provided in this section, upon the filing of the petition herein provided for, the procedure shall be the same as in civil actions.
“The matter shall be heard de novo and the judge shall enter his order affirming the act or order of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Johnson v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watson Seafood & Poultry Co. v. George W. Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Duncan v. AyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Watson Seafood & Poultry Co. v. George W. Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API