Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas F. Stockheimer, Leonard A. Peth, Harry Days and Mark Van Dyke
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 28, 1998No. 97-1939, 97-2017, 97-2018 and 97-2019PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Word got around that an organization called Family Farm Preservation (FFP) had developed a novel method of debt management — the Certified Money Order (CMO). Inquiring minds learned that for a suggested donation of $500, FFP would provide a packet of blank CMOs, and some sample documents illustrating how to use them. FFP’s CMOs were a little larger than ordinary cur rency and were in the form of figure 1, below. FFP typically included a numbered receipt for certified mail and a return receipt card with each packet of CMOs.
[[Image here]]
According to the instructions FFP…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States v. Abraham HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Marcus LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James HerrimanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. James Thomas McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.