Kalson v. Percival
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff appeals from an order setting aside a default and judgment against the defendant entered on motion under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Briefly, plaintiff’s contention is that the affidavit upon which the motion was based stated no meritorious case of surprise, mistake, inadvertence or excusable neglect, and therefore the court abused its discretion in setting aside the default., It is the well-established policy of the law to have legal controversies tried upon their merits, and unless it can he determined as matter of law that a trial court has abused its…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Burbank v. Continental Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hambrick v. HambrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.