Legal Opinion

Hodgkins v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1893No. 4462PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

The first question presented by the record in this case is the sufficiency of the information, which is here set out:

*161“In the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska. The State of Nebraska, plaintiff, v. Hodgkins and Frank Trumble, defendants.
“State of Nebraska, }

Lancaster County. }

ss.

“John W. Mussetter, being first duly sworn, on his oath complains that the defendants, Milo Hodgkins and Frank Trumble, for that said Milo Hodgkins and Frank Trumble, at the county of Lancaster and state of Nebraska, on the 13th day of March, 1890, in and upon the bodies of Marshal Stein and O. W. McAllister…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washburn v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Cowan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Richards v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Whitman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. In Re TalleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  4. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Carrall v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API