Legal Opinion
State v. Landa
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 2, 2002No. C4-00-1673PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
On May 11, 2000, Mitchell Jay Landa was convicted of first-degree aggravated robbery. Landa appealed his conviction and argued, among other things, that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction because the eyewitness identifications were inaccurate and unreliable and (2) the district court abused its discretion in refusing to give an alibi instruction to the jury. In an unpublished opinion, the court of appeals rejected all of Landa’s arguments and affirmed the conviction. We affirm.
On December 31,1999, around 3:00 p.m., a man wearing an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- State v. RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.