Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robertson v. King

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 27, 1955No. 5-715Published

1DissentJ. Seaborn Holt, Justice

I think this case should be affirmed for the reason that as I read the record, there was ample substantial evidence to support ihe findings and judgment of the trial court.

A jury having been waived, we must give to those findings and judgment the same force and effect that we give to the verdict of a jury, therefore, when we find some substantial evidence to support the findings and judgment of the trial court viewed in the light most favorable to appellee (here), we must affirm.

In this case there was testimony in the record that appellant at the time he purchased the truck in question was an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haynie v. DicusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Sykes v. DickersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API