Legal Opinion

Haynie v. Dicus

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 13, 1947No. 4-8041PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobiNS, J.

The Chancery Court held, in a suit begun by the father of appellant, Thomas Haynie, Jr., a minor, as his next friend, to cancel a contract by which appellee sold to said minor appellant and said appellant bought from appellee a “milk route” and truck for $700 and to recover back from appellee said purchase money, that the properties sold were “necessaries” for appellant, and refused the relief prayed.

The decree appealed from recites that the trial below was had on oral testimony adduced in open court. This testimony ivas not preserved by bill of exceptions or otherwise; and no testimony…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. NelmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Carpenter v. EllenbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  4. Hershy v. BermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  5. Tedford v. ChickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oliver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Sykes v. DickersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Valencia v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Robertson v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API