Legal Opinion

Belgian American Investments & Trade, Inc. v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 16, 1989No. Civ.A. No. CA 3-88-2731-GPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FISH, District Judge.

This case is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for new trial in light of Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1361, 103 L.Ed.2d 602 (1989).1 Because Coit largely *463overturned the Hudspeth doctrine, id. at 1366-76, the motion for a new trial is granted to the extent of vacating the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims against the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (“FSLIC”).2 In light of recent Supreme Court pronouncements, however, the court is of the opinion that this case should…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. North Mississippi Savings & Loan Association and New North Mississippi Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Joseph M. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. Save the Bay, Inc. v. The United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Belgian American v. FdicCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API