Nichols v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Lake Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The information charges appellant with obstructing a public highway, and thus describes it: “A certain public highway, located and situated on the half section line running north and south, through the center of section 11, township 33, range 9, Lake county, Indiana.”
~We deem the description sufficient. It is not necessary for the prosecutor to state the facts which constitute the way a public one; the requirements of the law are complied with by the averment that the way obstructed is a public highway. The term “ public highway” has a fixed and well known signification, and no useful purpose…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Williams v. KingmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Sheaff v. People ex rel. ColwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- State v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stewart v. SwartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Discher v. KlappIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- Bamberger Electric R. v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited v. Enos Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.