Legal Opinion

North American Oil Consolidated v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided May 24, 1928No. Docket Nos. 8714, 16107PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*88OPINION.

ARundell:

By amendment to its petition in Docket No. 8714 the petitioner claims that collection of any.taxes for the year 1917 is barred by the statute of limitations. By the terms of Commissioner’s Mimeograph 3085, promulgated April 11, 1923, the “ waiver ” of January 19, 1923, expired on April 1, 1924. Before the expiration date of the first “waiver” a second one was executed on January 2, 1924, and filed January 10 of the same year. A third was executed on January 12, 1924, and filed on January 17, 1924, which was identical with the January 2nd “waiver” except that the year 1918 was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. United States v. Chicago & E. I. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sweinhart v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  2. Murphy Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  3. North Am. Oil Consol. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  4. Schermerhorn Oil Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API