Legal Opinion

State v. Allderige

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 9, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The defendant was charged with and convicted of violation of § 1702c of the General Stat utes, Cum. Sup. 1935, which provides that “any person who shall neglect or refuse to furnish reasonably necessary support to his wife, child, grandchild, parent or grandparent” shall be punished or dealt with as therein provided. The finding reflects the evidence in that it is brief and in some respects unsatisfactory. It states that the defendant and his wife intermarried in September, 1933, and lived together in West Haven, two of the wife’s brothers rooming and boarding with them, until May 8th, 1937.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dadio v. DadioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Brewer v. BrewerNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  4. McClees v. McCleesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. State v. BagwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JordanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  3. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Berger v. BergerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. McCrohan v. McCrohanConnecticut Superior Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API