McKnight v. Dyson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before DeVorE, J., Sumter, April, 1911. Action by H. D. McKnight against W. J. Dyson and C. D. Dyson in court of Magistrate Horace Harley. From Circuit order plaintiff appeals. cites: Witness only called and sworn is not subject to cross-examination: 58 S. C. 75; 43 Ala. 406; 14 Ark. 555. If there be error in refusing cross-examination it is cured by party calling witness as his own: 61 S. C. 292. Oral argument.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Gary.
1 This is an 'appeal from an order of the Circuit Court, granting a new trial in a case, in which a magistrate had rendered judgment. This is not a case in which this Court can render judgment absolute, and, therefore, the order is not appealable. Lampley v. A. C. L. Ry., 77 S. C. 319, 57 S. E. 1104; Pace & Co. v. A. C. L. Ry., 83 S. C. 33, 64 S. E. 915; DesChamps v. A. C. L. Ry., 83 S. C. 192; 65 S. E. 176; Dixon v. S. A. L. Ry., 83 S. C. 393, 65 S. E. 351; Jones v. Woodside Cotton Mills, 83 S. C. 565, 65 S. E. 819; Barker v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lampley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Barker v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- C. L. Pace & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Dixon v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Jones v. Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Snipes v. Davis, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925