Legal Opinion

Speck v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 1980No. 79-817PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti

Amalgamated Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, Edward Ochylski, Jr., and Daniel L. Houlihan (hereinafter called the applicants), filed an application for a variation in the nature of a special use for the approval of the location and erection of an addition to the south of an existing building to be used as a meat packing plant, including slaughtering, rendering, cutting and boning facilities in an area zoned manufacturing. The plaintiffs-appellees (hereinafter called the objectors) intervened as objectors in the proceeding. With one exception, they are residents living near the property.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Lansdowne Borough Board of Adjustment's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hassell v. Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bainter v. Village of AlgonquinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Speck v. Zoning Board of AppealsIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Central Transport, Inc. v. Village of HillsideAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. CENTRAL TRANSPORT v. Village of HillsideAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Tiskilwa Economic Development Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API