Legal Opinion
Dumas v. Conyer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 26, 1968No. 41771PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, as the owner of “Lots 7-11, inclusive, of Dumas Replat of Original Block 40, City of Purcell, Oklahoma,” commenced a district court proceeding for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendants in error, as the persons holding certain positions with the City of Purcell, to connect, or permit him to connect, the water, sewer, and electric lines constructed and installed by him on said property to the city-owned and operated water, sewer, and electric utility systems adjacent to said property, and to furnish water, sewer, and electric services to the property.
H…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Secrest v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Midwest City v. EckroatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Murdock v. LoeffelholzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Flag-Redfern Oil CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
- Wickware v. National Mortgage Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- State ex rel. Weatherford v. Senior Security Life Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996