Legal Opinion
In re Birner
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
By order of this court, made pursuant to section 4-a of the Arbitration Law, the validity of a contract containing provision for arbitration is presented for determination. The essential facts as stipulated by the parties are as follows:
A contract for the purchase and sale of 400 barrels of wine, each containing fifty gallons, was made on January 29, 1934, *723in the city of New York, on behalf and for the account of Santa Lucia Wineries, Inc., a California corporation, through its sole and exclusive agent in New York State, the Catz American Co., Inc. On January 29, 1934, the Santa Lucia…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Standard Casing Co. v. . California Casing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- McCormick & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Fosdick v. Investors Syndicate, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farber v. John Aquino Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Lido Capital Corp. v. VogelNew York City Court · 1936
- Central Trust Co. v. Mann's Restaurants, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
- Diapulse Manufacturing Corp. of America v. Birtcher Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963