Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1990No. Nos. 57424, 57626PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Appeal from the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of a Rule 29.15 motion. Movant seeks to vacate an October, 1987, judgment of two counts of possession of a controlled substance. Movant was sentenced as a class X offender to concurrent fifteen-year terms. See State v. Jordan, 778 S.W.2d 283 (Mo.App.1989). Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

On June 2, 1988, movant filed a pro se Rule 29.15 motion complaining of trial errors. On June 27, 1988, his appointed lawyer filed an unverified amended motion. The amended motion specifically omitted the trial errors alleged in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mills v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Quinn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Bevly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Batson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Price v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. MeyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API