Legal Opinion
State v. Meyers
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 1992No. Nos. 56439, 57902PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
This court remanded State v. Meyers, 811 S.W.2d 400 (Mo.App.1991) to the circuit court for the purpose of re-examining defendant’s Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) challenge to the jury. We there held that defendant, a white man, had standing to make a Batson challenge on the authority of Powers v. Ohio, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1364, 113 L.Ed.2d 411 (1991). We found remand necessary because the state offered no explanation of its peremptory strikes of black venire members after the court ruled Batson did not apply unless “all blacks have [been]…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seibert v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. O'ConnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996