Legal Opinion

Maurer v. County of Putnam

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony J. Ferraro, J.

Defendants move to dismiss the complaint on grounds that the action was untimely commenced against both defendants and is therefore barred by the respective Statutes of Limitation.

The plaintiff by notice of motion and affidavit dated November 23, 1976 (Motion Calendar No. 18) moves to withdraw the action as against defendant, Weizenecker. Accordingly, the application to dismiss with respect to said defendant is granted without opposition.

As regards the codefendant, County of Putnam, the governing statute is section 50-i (subd 1, par [c]) of the General Municipal Law which requires that an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Serravillo v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Joiner v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. Family Bargain Centers, Inc. v. Village of HerkimerNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Bellows v. County of MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garr v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Clerk v. HurdNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API