Legal Opinion

Rezac Livestock Commission Co., Inc. v. Pinnacle Bank

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 9, 2020No. 5:15-cv-04958Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS REZAC LIVESTOCK COMMISSION CO., INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 15-4958-DDC v. PINNACLE BANK, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Rezac Livestock Commission Co., Inc. has asserted conversion, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and civil conspiracy claims against defendants Dinsdale Bros., Inc., (“Dinsdale”) and Pinnacle Bank (“Pinnacle”). Plaintiff has requested a trial by jury “on all issues.” Doc. 52; see also Doc. 101 at 16. The parties’ proposed jury instructions framed a dispute whether plaintiff’s unjust enrichment…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API