Legal Opinion

Driveaway & Truckaway Service, Inc. v. Aaron Driveaway & Truckaway Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 5, 1991No. 91 C 1603PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KOCORAS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a motion by defendants, Aaron Driveaway & Truckaway Co. and Aanthony’s Driveaway Truckaway Co. (“Truckaway”). Truckaway’s motion is entitled a “Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Prayer For Punitive Damages” and is purportedly pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). For the reasons set forth below, Truckaway’s motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

Truckaway is a New York corporation engaged in the business of transporting vehicles throughout the United States. It also retains agency relationships in a number of states for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Care Initiatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Thomas H. Egan v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Also Known as Baker Protective Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Ehlerding v. American Mattress & Upholstery, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016
  4. Victor Edward Villanueva Sevilla v. James Doyle, et al.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API