Gantman v. United Pacific Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, P. J.
—In this case we hold that individual members of a homeowners association in a planned residential development have no standing to maintain an action against insurance companies on policies purchased by and issued to the homeowners association managing the development and under which plaintiffs are not insureds. We therefore affirm summary judgment in favor of defendants United Pacific Insurance Company (United) and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) and against plaintiffs Melvyn and Sharon Gantman.
We also affirm the judgment in favor of defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- C & H. FOODS CO. v. Hartford Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Hatchwell v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Paul for Council v. HanyeczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Krystkowiak v. W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Adelman v. Associated Internat. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Billmeyer v. Plaza Bank of CommerceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Abers v. RounsavellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.