Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Tharp

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 19, 1931No. 3 Div. 967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This appeal involves the jurisdiction and power of the probate court to revoke the probate of a supposed will of a decedent, and admit to probate the true will.

The record discloses that on the death of F. B. Tharp in 1926 search was made for his will. The original was not found, but a supposed carbon copy was found in the files of his attorney. On an appropriate proceeding- this copy was proven and admitted to probate as the last will and testament of the decedent. In' 1931 the original will, duly witnessed, was found.

The difference between the two is that in the copy supposed to be the true…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Roy v. SegristSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  3. Conzet v. HibbenIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Heirs of Hill v. Hill's ex'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  5. Sowell v. Sowell's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Elliott's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Caverno v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Ex Parte DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Kelley v. SutliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API