Legal Opinion

Conzet v. Hibben

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cumberland county; the Hon. Walter Brewer, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Farmer

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Cumberland county affirming a judgment of the county court of said county refusing the probate of an instrument alleged to be the last will and testament of Charles Conzet, deceased.

Charles Conzet died December io, 1912, leaving surviving him a widow, Louisa C. Conzet, and Edward Conzet, J. C. Conzet, John Conzet, Eliza Conzet and Henrietta Meeker, his brothers and sisters, as his next of kin and only heirs-at-law. At the January, 1913, term of the county court of Cumberland county an instrument bearing date of February 21, 1896, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foote v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cousens v. Advent ChurchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  3. Mosser v. FlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of LymanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Atkins v. WombleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. McGee v. VandeventerIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Crooker v. McArdleIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Oliver v. OliverIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Swisher v. McMainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API