Legal Opinion · Dissent

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. King

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1998No. Nos. 98-423 and 98-424Published

1Dissent

Moyer, C J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to impose a one-year suspension on King, and a six-month suspension on Pope, with both sanctions stayed. The behavior of respondents King and Pope was of such a nature that an actual suspension is warranted in both cases.

The evidence clearly supports the finding of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court that King and Pope were in violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation). King and Pope conspired in a scheme to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. SteinOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. StinchfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. StrobelOhio Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API