Legal Opinion
Tokyo Electron Arizona, Inc. v. Discreet Industries Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 3, 2003No. CV 01-3245(DRH)(WDW)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALL, United States Magistrate Judge.
By sealed order dated January 29, 2003, the plaintiff, Tokyo Electron Arizona (“TAZ”), was awarded reasonable attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to Federal Rule 37, to be recovered from the defendants, Discreet Industries and Ovadia Meron (“Discreet”), in connection with TAZ’s July 16, 2002 motion to compel and subsequent motion for contempt. After an extension of the time in which to submit papers in support of the award of fees and costs, chambers received the plaintiffs supporting papers on February 20, 2003. The defendants’ papers in opposition…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Lyons Partnership, L.P. v. D & L Amusement & Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- In re Anmuth Holdings LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Palm Bay International, Inc. v. Marchesi Di Barolo S.P.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- In Re AmbotieneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.