Legal Opinion
Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. Maine Central Railroad
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 10, 1973No. Civ. A. 156-73PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CORCORAN, District Judge.
I
This action was brought by the Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company (herein the BAR) against the Maine Central Railroad Company (herein the Maine Central) pursuant to the provisions of 9 U.S.C. Sec. 9 to enforce an award by an arbitration committee of the Association of American Railroads (herein AAR) of which both parties are members. The defendant has challenged this Court’s jurisdiction over the subject matter of the complaint and alternatively its jurisdiction over the person of the defendants pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Ballantine Books Inc. v. Capital Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Krauss Bros. Lumber v. Louis Bossert & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- In Re the Arbitration Between Victorias Milling Co. & Hugo Neu Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- In Re WoernerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Aubie BALTIN; Gwilda Baltin, Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. ALARON TRADING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- General Atomic Co. v. United Nuclear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Maine Central Railroad v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Commercial Metals Company v. Balfour, Guthrie, and Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Nicole Quezada v. Bechtel OG & C ConstructionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.