Richter v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurrence
*1277THOMAS, Justice,
specially concurring.
I am in complete accord with all that is said in the majority opinion with respect to the affirmance of Alvin Richter’s conviction. Other Wyoming cases support the conclusion that Alvin Richter is chargeable with those aspects of Ronald Richter’s conduct that constitute the elements of the crime in this case. See Coca v. State, Wyo., 423 P.2d 382 (1967); Lujan v. State, Wyo., 423 P.2d 388 (1967); Borrego v. State, Wyo., 423 P.2d 393 (1967); Espy v. State, 54 Wyo. 291, 92 P.2d 549 (1939).
I agree that Ronald Richter’s conviction should be affirmed. I would,…
Also in this document: Dissent · Rose; Dissent · Thomas.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.