Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided June 19, 2012No. 2010-CA-01470-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Charlie Honeycutt1 appeals the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment and a final judgment of dismissal to all defendants. Honeycutt argues that the actions of Mississippi State Trooper Tommy Coleman (Trooper Coleman) were not subject to the requirements of the Mississippi Tort Claims Act (MTCA); that the cancellation notice provided by Atlanta Casualty Company (Atlanta Casualty) was ineffective; and that the insurance company through its agent had a duty to obtain a knowing and intelligent waiver of the uninsured-motorist coverage. The circuit court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cherry v. Anthony, Gibbs, SageMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Wilbourn v. Stennett, Wilkinson & WardMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  4. GODFREY v. Huntington Lumber & Supply CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Corban v. United Services Automobile Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Honeycutt v. ColemanMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Charlie Honeycutt v. Tommy ColemanMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Schopp v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API