Legal Opinion

Detroit United Railway v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1921No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Bill by the Detroit United Railway against the city of Detroit and others to enjoin the performance of a contract for the construction of a street railway. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

Chapter xiii, tit. iv, of the Detroit city charter, makes provision for acquisition and operation! of a municipal street railway system by the city, and the issuance of public utility bonds.to purchase or construct the same when authorized by an affirmative vote of three-fifths of the electors of said city. Such charter provision is authorized by the so-called home rule act (Act No. 279, Pub. Acts 1909, as amended [1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 3304 et seq.]) and Article 8 of the State Constitution.

On January 27, 1920, the common council of Detroit adopted an ordinance relative to the city acquiring,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Detroit United Railway v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dutch Cookie MacHine Co. v. Vande VredeMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Chizek v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Van Baalen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API