Gordon v. Cadwalader
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George Clark, Black & Clark, and W. A. Anderson, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Defendants appeal from so much of the judgment as determines that the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, intervener, has a right of way for railroad purposes across the land described in the complaint, and from that part of it which quiets intervener’s title to said right of way without compelling compensation to defendants.
This is the second appeal in this case. In the decision on the former appeal it was held that the deed from William Gordon to his son John Gordon of the property for and during his natural life, and after his death to descend to his heirs, was not subject to the rule in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Taylor v. New Orleans Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Muller v. Southern Pacific Branch Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Los Angeles Brick & Clay Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Thompson v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Rogers v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Gibson v. McReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Horstmann v. SheldonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962