Legal Opinion

Randall v. Sanford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 21, 1985No. A8310 06399; CA A30796Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for strict foreclosure of a real estate contract. The trial court granted their motion for summary judgment and entered an interlocutory decree of strict foreclosure. Plaintiffs then moved to set aside the interlocutory decree on the basis that it was beyond the scope of their complaint and motion for summary judgment. The trial court denied the motion to set aside but entered an order modifying the interlocutory decree. Plaintiffs appeal from the interlocutory decree, assigning as error the court’s entry of the interlocutory decree and its failure to set it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of HurlbuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Wiley v. BergOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. West Portland Development Co. v. Ward Cook, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Slipp Et Ux v. Amato Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Overton v. BlakeOregon Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API