Legal Opinion

Slipp Et Ux v. Amato Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This was a suit for the strict foreclosure of a contract for the purchase of real property. Following a trial, and on September 28, 1961, the court entered an interlocutory decree which required defendants to pay the balance found due on the contract on or before December 28, 1961, or thereafter their rights would be barred. On December 29, 1961, the court entered a decree which foreclosed all of plaintiffs’ rights and interest in the property. On January 5, 1962, defendants filed a motion and affidavit alleging that they had then been able to obtain the money with which to redeem and asked…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lyon v. MazerisOregon Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re McCallenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1985
  3. Johnson v. OverbayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Palmateer v. Homestead Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Vista Management, Ltd. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API