Legal Opinion
Titan Indem. Co. v. City of Brandon, Miss.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided June 30, 1997No. 3:96-cv-00820PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiff Titan Indemnity Company’s motion for summary judgment against defendants City of Brandon, Mississippi, and Bruce Kirby pursuant to Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 Plaintiff Titan Indemnity Company is the insurer of defendants pursuant to the provisions of a law enforcement liability insurance policy. By the present motion for summary judgment, plaintiff asks this court for a holding that it has no obligation to defend or indemnify the defendants in a civil action in federal court filed by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lillian Washington, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arsane Washington v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MS Credit Center, Inc. v. HortonMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Community Care Center of Vicksburg v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
- Allgood v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2008
- Banks v. Cavalier Homes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2024
- Mississippi Credit Center, Inc. v. Catherine HortonMississippi Supreme Court · 2004