Legal Opinion

In Re Conservatorship of Mansur

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1985No. C2-84-1854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

This appeal was taken by the conserva-tee from the allowance of a final accounting. Appellant contends the trial court improperly allowed excessive fees charged by the prior conservator and attorneys. The attorneys filed a notice of review from the trial court’s disallowance of $3,162.49 incurred in transferring the estate to the successor conservator and attorneys. We affirm the accounting and reverse the dis-allowance of the transition period attorney fees.

FACTS

The conservatee, a 57-year-old attorney, was injured in an automobile accident in April 1980. In August 1982…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of Serbus v. SerbusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. In Re Estate of BaumgartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. In Re Estate of BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Spannaus v. ArrowoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Jacobson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Binford v. GibsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re Guardianship and Conservatorship of CordelNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of DoyleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In re Conservatorship of GrunlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. In re: Guardianship and Conservatorship of Carolyn H. Jemison.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API