In Re Conservatorship of Mansur
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
This appeal was taken by the conserva-tee from the allowance of a final accounting. Appellant contends the trial court improperly allowed excessive fees charged by the prior conservator and attorneys. The attorneys filed a notice of review from the trial court’s disallowance of $3,162.49 incurred in transferring the estate to the successor conservator and attorneys. We affirm the accounting and reverse the dis-allowance of the transition period attorney fees.
FACTS
The conservatee, a 57-year-old attorney, was injured in an automobile accident in April 1980. In August 1982…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estate of Serbus v. SerbusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- In Re Estate of BaumgartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- In Re Estate of BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Spannaus v. ArrowoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Jacobson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of Binford v. GibsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re Guardianship and Conservatorship of CordelNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of DoyleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Conservatorship of GrunlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- In re: Guardianship and Conservatorship of Carolyn H. Jemison.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.