State v. Lynch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
I. M. OLSEN, Justice.
Defendant Aras convicted of the crime of arson in the third degree and appeals from an order denying his motion for a neAv trial.
The verdict is challenged as not sufficiently sustained by the e\údence. The crime charged is that defendant set on fire and burned up an automobile, described in the indictment, Avith intent to destroy the automobile and to prejudice a named insurer thereof. That the automobile Avas burned, that it Avas insured, and that the insurance thereon Avas paid by the insurer, is undisputed. The automobile had been sold to one R. A. McLean by one Emmett…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Glassberg v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Sonnesyn v. HawbakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Carpenter v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Farmers Merchants nat.bank of Ivanhoe v. PrzymusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LupinoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Bartl v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Bartl v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955