Legal Opinion

State v. Stinson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 8319SC199Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant claims that the two aggravating factors found by the court were, in effect, one factor, thereby requiring a new sentencing hearing. See State v. Ahearn, 307 N.C. 584, 300 S.E. 2d 689 (1983). We disagree. Defendant had a prior conviction for an offense punishable by more than 60 days. In addition, at the very time he committed the offense of first degree burglary and attempted second degree rape, he was under a suspended sentence for the prior felony conviction. These are two clearly distinct aggravating factors. We find that the trial judge properly considered them in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. YanceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. GloverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API