Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Onetta Boat Works, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 30, 1969No. Civ. 66-218PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KILKENNY, District Judge:
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages against defendant Onetta Boat Works, Inc. (Onetta) for an alleged breach of a contract to construct and deliver to plaintiff a 57 foot steel hull fishing vessel. Plaintiff also seeks to recover from the three defendant insurance companies on the policies of hull and machinery insurance which those companies issued on the vessel and in which the plaintiff was named as the assured.
Onetta seeks relief against plaintiff in three counterclaims:
First, to foreclose a preferred ship mortgage given by plaintiff to Onetta to secure the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Lanasa Fruit Steamship & Importing Co. v. Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reefer Queen Co., Inc. v. MARINE CONSTR. AND DESIGN CO.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crown Zellerbach Corporation v. Willamette-Western Corporation, a Corporation, Dba Willamette Tug & Barge Company, and Richard J. OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Witcher Construction Co. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Rydman v. Martinolich Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Company, Inc. v. C.N. Lloyd Brasileiro, the Hartford Insurance Company of Alabama, in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Coleman v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.