Legal Opinion

Stanzel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1929No. 12449Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON , MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Appellant questions the correctness of our opinion in construing the two attached affidavits as one instrument. They were made before the same magistrate on the same date and were fastened together with a clip which would seem to justify the conclusion that they should be considered together as one document. Further strength is added to such conclusion because, until the contrary is shown, we must assume the magistrate acted within his legal rights in issuing the search warrant. This right did not arise from the recitals in either of the affidavits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Dozier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Means v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API